🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, may align too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of the president. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although he is called Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to question.